Jump to content
  • Malvern, Help Registration Closed
  • Malvern, Help Registration Closed
  • Malvern, Help Registration Closed

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dombanks

    3

  • pistonbroke

    3

  • Blatman

    3

  • SteveD

    3

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Looks like a tidy car but would want to know a bit more about the origins of the chassis befor parting with £££
Posted

looks ok to me for the money - wonder what is on the log book

clearly has westy front and scuttle but you cannot tell from the piccies what chassis it is although the front end suspension looks westy like

only thing I would say is why would you put the digi dash there

if you could clear up the uncertainty then why not

Posted

From DVLA website -

The vehicle details for L102 DHA are:  

Date of Liability  01 10 2010  

Date of First Registration  15 07 2008  

Year of Manufacture  2008  

Cylinder Capacity (cc)  1998CC  

CO2 Emissions  0g/Km  

Fuel Type  Petrol  

Export Marker  Not Applicable  

Vehicle Status  Licence Not Due  

Vehicle Colour  BLUE  

Vehicle Type Approval  

Vehicle Excise Duty Rate for vehicle    

6 Months Rate  £112.75  

12 Months Rate  £205.00

Posted

Maybe it's been to Ireland and back again  ???

Wasn't there a discussion about this practice a short while ago  ???

Posted

Surely it's simply a Locost built using part of an original Westfield chassis....

That's my best guess... :D

I thought the chassis and chassis number made the car, the car it is?

How many people on here use 100% westfield parts on their cars? What % non Westfield parts make a Westfield a Locost?

Got me thinking this has!  :D

Posted

mines in the center of my dash but that ones a bit oo far over to the left isnt it?

also the passenger footwell looks quite narrow but i guess to get the engine that far back you'd have to chop a bit out of the chassis

Posted
clone  :sheep:
Posted

Surely it's simply a Locost built using part of an original Westfield chassis....

That's my best guess... <!--emo&:D

I thought the chassis and chassis number made the car, the car it is?

How many people on here use 100% westfield parts on their cars? What % non Westfield parts make a Westfield a Locost?

Got me thinking this has!  :D

The chassis and chassis number do define the identity of the car however.... (and not implying in any way that it is the situation in this instance)

Old westfield chassis come up for sale on ebay etc on quite a regular basis which have had the chassis numbers removed, this may be for a number of reasons such as where the original car having been rebuilt with a new/replacement chassis from the factory utilising the original chassis number.  When this is done the factory will ask you to return the chassis number which ensures that there are not two cars bearing the same chassis number.

The old chassis (with the missing chassis number) may then be sold for parts/ repair etc. but...  although this could be accurately described as a modified westfield chassis the completed car legally could not be described or sold as a Westfield as it does not have a westfield  identity/chassis number.  In the same way that locost with a chassis dimensionally identical to a westfield and with westfield body work could not be called a westfield.

As said not saying this is the case for the car in the op, just clarifying when a westfield may not be a westfield.

Posted
Surely it's simply a Locost built using part of an original Westfield chassis....

That's my best guess... :D

I had the same fleeting thought...

That's what I reckon is going on.

Thoughts:

1) Roll bar mounts are to far inboard, both uprights and braces, for a Westfield

2) Pre Lit stylre bodywork

3) Not easy to make out, but it seems to have SE wishbones, which doesn't tie up with the pre lit rear.

4) Engine mounted way to far back.

5) Bulk head panel to short

6) Tunnel looks to wide

Posted
no diaganol top braces on the chassis either  :( just emailed the seller for more info
Posted

Were there any Pre-Lits with removable rear arches as they look removable to me ?

Posted
Where there any Pre-Lits with removable rear arches as they look removable to me ?

The early alloy bodied ones were, but any prelit will have a much older reg than an L-plate.

Posted

Removable arches were standard on pre-lits just as they are on Caterhams 'cos the body is ally, the wings are 'glass ;)

Post lit the body is all glass and with fixed arches up unti detachable arches made a "come back" in about the mid 90's...

Posted

Yep  ;) very early ones were ali bodied with fibreglass arches, later pre-lits were all fibre glass bodied  ;)  ;)  :D

but any prelit will have a much older reg than an L-plate.
not necessarily
Post lit the body is all glass
known as SE and Sei wide - later pre-lits were also all fibreglass body with intergral wings and swept or cycle wings option to front

Yes I am old, yes I have been around Westfields for too long and yes I have a good memory  :D  :D  :blush:  :blush: (and anorak)  :blush:  :blush:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.