Jump to content

Plate character spacing fail - try different garage?


John K

Recommended Posts

 

 

What about the BSAU number and manufacturers postcode details, pretty sure that is a legal requirement?

 

this place sells them with the post code and BS number.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this place sells them with the post code and BS number.

 
Nice find :)
 
Mines reflective with correct spacings, so hoping the law will be ok with it.just cut down overall size due to it being 6 digit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The legality or not of stick on plates is a different subject that has been discussed on this forum more than once and so far I've never seen a definitive answer on the question, but there are plenty of members who use them and get MOTs without issue. My comment was that if a stick on plate was to be used then make sure it's as legal as can be, the original post did not mention that the issue was related to it being stick on it was that the plate did not conform to the legal spacing requirements.

 

With regards to these questions I have attached the relevant pages from the testers manual that indicate there is no mention of a reason for rejection for stick on number plates or for the lack of BS numbers etc. The BS numbers and the place of manufacturer were introduced as requirements some time ago but recinded later.

 

So the main issues are MoI 2 and RfR 2c that require a check that the plates are mounted "as near vertical as practicably possible" and MoI 4 and RfR 4a that require a check on relevant spacing of characters and groups of characters. A previous poster stated that it is not a requirement for a tester to measure the spacing but there is an approved template that can be used as a quick check. It is however generally at the discretion of the tester to decide that the spacing is "obviously incorrect" or that the plate is mounted "as near vertical as is practicable".

 

Even the previously accepted white or yellow 'reflective' background is not listed as a reason for rejection (RfR) only a reference to white to the front and yellow to the rear.

 

Testers%20manual%20reg%20plate_zpssmjymu

 

Testers%20manual%20reg%20plate%20pg2_zps

 

However, just because an item meets the standards required by the MoT test does not always mean that it is legal to use on the road as the Road Traffic Act may be different and it is this that a traffic officer may refer to. DVSA are often at pains to indicate that the MoT is a minimum standard inspection of safety but not an indication of a vehicle being in good condition or legality in use on the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.