Man On The Clapham Omnibus Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 I was a smoker for about 9 years but haven't smoked for a very long time. An ex-smoker is, they say, more avid about banning than a life-long non-smoker. Personally, I find smoke unpleasant but not so much that I totally avoid pubs where smoking is allowed. In restaurants, though, I strongly dislike smoke. If there is a partial ban I suspect that some perfectly good pubs that serve good-value food will stop in order to appease their smoking non-eating clientele. How say the massive? Quote
adhawkins Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 Personally, I hate the smell of cigarette smoke. I guess being the child of parents that both smoked was one of the reasons. Personally, I'd be in favour of a total ban in all enclosed public places. One thing I hate is going to the pub and coming home stinking of the stuff... Andy Quote
Mark B Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 Ban the lot for me, but then again I don't smoke..... Quote
steppenwolf Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 I am an ex-smoker and we are the worst! I cannot believe that I inflicted such horrible 'secondaries' on people for nearly 4 years! Total ban seems good to me - it would open up a whole load of venues that I currently avoid. Quote
Paul Hurdsfield - Joint Manchester AO Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 My motto is "Ban it on the Planet" Quote
Bean Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 Total ban, what gives people the right to poison the air I breathe. Quote
adhawkins Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 Total ban, what gives people the right to poison the air I breathe. Gonna ban cars too then? Andy Quote
dern Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 I'm all for imposing my will on others through legislation... Quote
Bean Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 Total ban, what gives people the right to poison the air I breathe. Gonna ban cars too then? <!--emo& Andy Perhaps that came across a little harsh, but you don't normally get as high a level of direct air pollution walking down the road as sitting in a pub for 2-3 hours. Quote
pistonbroke Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 How would you police a total smoking ban Quote
adhawkins Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 I assume he means a total ban in public places. In which case, I presume it wouldn't necessarily actively be policed, unless there's a complaint against either a person or an establishment. Andy Quote
jak Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 I'm all for imposing my will on others through legislation... Better than imposing cancer on someone through passive smoking Quote
Jamey J Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 When i used to smoke i went to ireland for a stag doo, irt worried me that i would not be able to smoke in a pup, i infact thought it was a better experience, the pubs had nice little beer gardens for the smokers and it was a pleasant way of meeting some people outside, it also made me feel like a lepper with a real problem, i realised i would endure getting soaked just to chuff on a death stick, i soon gave up after that! Ban it as far as i'm concerned it will do more good than harm! Quote
dern Posted February 14, 2006 Posted February 14, 2006 Better than imposing cancer on someone through passive smoking Tell you what, if you can find any generally accepted evidence that supports the theory that passive smoking causes cancer I'll support a ban too... ok? Please note that mentioning Roy Castle does not, in my mind, constitute generally accepted evidence Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.