MK11 Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 Is it just me that doesn't like the new FW rear body? The nose I could live with, I think, although bonnet opening would possibly drive me mad, but the rear just does nothing for me and the roof on the FW bodywork just looks rubbish to me. This is beginning to cause me a little concern, as most of the cars I see that have the spec I would prefer look great, right up until I see the rear end. I could, of course fork out to build one with the nice rear on, but if the new bodywork is what people want then it could cause an issue if/when I try to sell. 1 Quote
Steve Smith - Joint Hampshire & IOW AO Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I think the FW looks fantastic, not like a seven copy. Each to their own. 3 Quote
MarkS2 Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I also like the FW and glad they have tried something new. But still love the old rear end too. Quote
Weekend Warrior Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I think the Rear end looks great ,flowing lines round modern lights ,a step n the right direction . The old rear end ,in my opinion ,was a bit boxy and the lights plain and basic ,when viewed from the back it could be a MK ,low cost, Caterahm ,Robin Hood,or any number of other makes . My rear end is curvy and distinctive and as such clearly a Westfield .. 1 Quote
Stu Faulkner Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I'm obviously biased but I prefer the FW. I do agree that with the roof it looks odd. 1 Quote
Dommo Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I didn't like the FW rear until I saw it in real life - then I was gutted I couldn't have it with the Mazda SDV Quote
CosKev Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I too am a fan of the 'classic' seven type rear end Quote
CraigHew Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 Clearly personal taste as demonstrated above. TBH I was about to buy a Caterham until I saw the FW rear end on a Westfield. It's such an improved departure from the normal 7-esk rears that I was smitten. So, that rear potentially saved me a small fortune...! 3 Quote
Kingster Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 I like the classic look myself and think it is very distinctively Westfield. The FW looks great too but very happy with my chunky behind! 2 Quote
Peter (Monty) Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 Seeing an FW in the wild was what caused me to look into building a Westfield in the first place! I like the difference from the classic seven look. 1 Quote
FW_MX5 Posted July 23, 2017 Posted July 23, 2017 On 22-7-2017 at 21:05, Dommo said: I didn't like the FW rear until I saw it in real life - then I was gutted I couldn't have it with the Mazda SDV You can if you do some mods to the rear diff. There's a build thread about it. Quote
Matta Posted July 24, 2017 Posted July 24, 2017 Must admit, although I like the FW, my preference is for the 'traditional' shape. I even prefer the earlier 'kit' bodywork over the ZK. Just think the lines of the car flow slightly better. They're all good though! Matt Quote
Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman Posted July 24, 2017 Posted July 24, 2017 All down to such a matter of taste! That said, personally, I like both traditional bodystyle cars and full FW, or any mix of the two. I'd love to have gone for the FW rear on my current car, but was nervous how it would look with the clamshell wings, plus, and these two points were the clincher, i keep the car outside and do use it in all weathers, this means the hood being on is its default state, I dislike the FW hood with a passion! And secondly, though I like the enclosed boot idea, it's just too damn small. Hood wise, it's a shame, I don't know if it's still current, but they came up with a much nicer hood design for the Sport Turbo, which also looks like it might have a better boot design. I do think the FW style in general though, breathes a much needed blast of fresh air into the whole "seven" market. And given that it was copied, almost to the mm, (oh the irony when Westfield tried to go legal), by another kit manufacturer, FW owners can't be the only ones to think it looks great! As far as the traditional shape goes, the early, narrow, low line, is by far the prettiest; and to my eye, the only one where the proportions of the body really suit cycle wings from all angles!! (I'm not saying cycle wings on a ZK wide body look ugly, just that from certain side views, from lower down especially, they do make the engine bay section look heavy and slightly out of proportion. That's where the clamshell wings help, by breaking up that view ) i think if building a track orientated Westfield, tough, I'd go FW every time. Quote
darve Posted July 24, 2017 Posted July 24, 2017 do any of the sport turbo get sold in the UK? never seen one or heard of one on the forum Quote
Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman Posted July 24, 2017 Posted July 24, 2017 51 minutes ago, darve said: do any of the sport turbo get sold in the UK? never seen one or heard of one on the forum Yes, but we're (or used to be) quite a different market. The U.K. ST's as far as I know tended to sell into the much more non-enthusiast type market as an alternative to other small volume, niche cars. On the odd occasions you see them out and about, they look so similar to FW's that you don't really notice them. AFAIK, from the outside, it's only really the scuttle and the rear of the tub that are subtly different. Obviously, from inside, the different dash stands out a mile. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.