Jump to content

MSA changes


conibear

Recommended Posts

Terry please re-read my post - it does not start in 2008  ;)  ;) it starts in 2009  ;)  :down:

Plus there are certain matters that are perhaps best not posted on a public forum for ways and means to address the need for cat converter  ;)  ;)  ;) without being over reactionary  ;) we have a year to put these in place  ;)  

What's needed is for as many people as possible to contact and lobby the MSA via phone - e-mail or letter as was originally requested last year with a posting by richard Green  ;)  ;)  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mark Stanton

    14

  • conibear

    6

  • windy

    5

  • RobC

    5

Agreed Mark. I will write again to MSA for clarification as far as I am concerned personally but would it not be possible to have a "petition" approach to carry weight etc due to numbers of people involved?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A petition may be of benefit in some manner  ;) It probably won't make drastic change .................. but may hopefully assist all involved  ;)  :)

Any volunteers to undertake this petition task, please step forward  :)

Sorry Terry, good idea but it is a huge task and needs the time and work required to make it feasible with support from as many championships as possible.  ;)  :) The ruling could possibly create mayhem amongst 2009 Motorsport  :down:  :down: neither drivers, championship organisers or MSA scrutineers are currently being given guidance or assistance on this matter  :down:  :down:

Without wanting to sound cynical perhaps if more folks had taken notice of Richard Greens posting early last year then it may have been different.  :down:

If anyone wishes to copy my original questions posed then please do so and send them to the MSA  ;)  :) I believe that they are direct and cover all key factors - may be we'll get different answers - in fact any written answer would be helpful  :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ruling could possibly create mayhem amongst 2009 Motorsport  :down:  :down: neither drivers, championship organisers or MSA scrutineers are currently being given guidance or assistance on this matter  :down:  :down:

The biggest message to the MSA that this ruling is perhaps in need of er... "review" will be when the grids/entries are 75% down in 2009 as hardly anyone will have an eligable car.  :bangshead:  :bangshead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ruling could possibly create mayhem amongst 2009 Motorsport  :down:  :down: neither drivers, championship organisers or MSA scrutineers are currently being given guidance or assistance on this matter  :down:  :down:

The biggest message to the MSA that this ruling is perhaps in need of er... "review" will be when the grids/entries are 75% down in 2009 as hardly anyone will have an eligable car.  :bangshead:  :bangshead:

But we have all been given quite a considerable time to employ a cat, which let's face it, ain't gunner cost alot in respect of what we have all already spent ???

Can't see how taking notice of the Richard Green post would influence the MSA, the bigger picture for the MSA surely is bigger than what we all on here have to say ???  IMO, this new regulation will be mandatory Jan 2009 as it's an environmental issue which is more political than a safety one ???  :down:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how do you fit a CAT and map engine so we dont reduce power on highly tuned engines

Antbody working on this like Dunnell, SBD, etc for Duratec engines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how do you fit a CAT and map engine so we dont reduce power on highly tuned engines

Antbody working on this like Dunnell, SBD, etc for Duratec engines

Agreed the cost could be considerable. My car for a start would be out. There is no way just fitting a lambda sensor and cat and a quick remap would sort it out. Trust me we have a hard enough time getting cars through emissions test for MOT as it is and they have not been mucked about with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought CAT's only work below 2.5/3k revs

not much point it being there after that.

sort of negates its use in motorsport doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunatley this appears very much a political move so the MSA can say that all production based cars run CAT's. Interestingly it doesn't say it has to work :D:D  Yet !

As it has been introduced by the MSA, we need to lobby them to drop it as "of dubious benifit"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pre 99 chassis  for sale anyone interested? :D  :D  :D  :D  :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

O.k here's to make it easy for everyone

Please copy and paste the questions below and e-mail, post or even hand it to John Symes of the MSA at Autosport Show.

If we have enough people asking the questions - perhaps we may get an answer and a clearer direction - but sorry folks you need to do something  :D  :D  :D  ;)  ;)

Please DO NOT put your own interpretation to these questions - I already have a verbal MSA answer which has been posted in the Speed Series info section  ;)  :down:  :bangshead:

____

Name .......................

Address .....................

Clarification of Rule 12.16.7

"Exhaust catalytic converters must be fitted to all petrol engined production based saloon, touring and sports cars, including specialist production and kit cars manufactured after 31 December 1999."

Q. Championships first registered prior to 31 December 2007 do not require the above ruling to be a mandatory requirement until 1 January 2009  ?

Q.For new championships established 2008, this ruling will be mandatory for 2008.  ?

Q. Where kit cars are specifically concerned: e.g. Westfield, Caterham, Locost, Raw Striker, Genesis, MK, Donkevoort etc

Does the term "manufactured" refer to the date of manufacture of the chassis and not that of the overall completion by the independent self builder or it's SVA, date of registration and/or MOT test where road-going. ?  

Q. Will it be mandatory for kit cars manufactured post 31 December 1999 to have a catalytic converter fitted regardless of age of engine, which may be pre 1999 and not designed for use with a catalytic converter. ?  

Q. Where kit cars are manufactured prior to 31 December 1999 but use an engine of a later date the use of a catalytic converter is not mandatory. ?  

Q. Where a catalytic converter is mandatory, this is to be applied to all road-going kit cars whether they be Q plated or year plated. ? (Please note that Q plated vehicles are subject to a visible smoke test only when undergoing an MOT)  ?

Q. Use of a catalytic converter is mandatory, subject to age of manufacture, when a motorbike engine fitment is used for the car build. ?  

Q. Is the rule 12.16.7 applicable to both road-going and modified non-road-going classes of kit car ?  

Q. The use of catalytic converters is to be checked and "policed" by the scrutineers of the meeting, which may from time to time be supplemented with the use of specialist certificated gas analysing equipment with trained operatives ?  

Q. The ruling 12.16.7 is applicable to all forms of sprinting, hill climbing and circuit racing. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark,

Some of your questions are not worded correctly. Some look like statements with a question mark at the end and miss the key words "Are", "Will", When", What" etc  :) For example - Q2, Q9 and Q10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well simply change em then goodness me - tell you what shall I write them all out  :bangshead:  :bangshead:  :bangshead: I knew only a Grade B "O" level English would loose me down one day  :bangshead:  :bangshead:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE
Please DO NOT put your own interpretation to these questions
 :)

:bangshead:  :bangshead:  :bangshead:  :bangshead:  :bangshead:  :bangshead:  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, stone me, this is a surprise isn't it?

Late one summer a magazine appears on the doorstep. Contained within are  draft rules for consultation.

A well known harbinger of doom foresees a possible problem and suggests that it might be a spiffing idea to write to the omnipotent architects that inhabit the mythical place known as Colnbrook....

Few are as visionary (or simply can't be arsed....after all it's someone else's problem isn't it?)

A few (five to be precise) hardy souls bother to write to the rule makers, (for blessed are the rulemakers),  offering constructive criticism and pointing out the potential chaos that may ensue from it. But five voices in the wilderness don't carry much weight.

The esteemed inhabitants of Colnbrook reply with words to the effect "five letters hardly amounted to a mass outcry did it?...." and duly goes ahead and ratifies the proposed rule.

Sometime later in a parallel universe:

The kit car motorsport fraternity finally realises the implications of the new rule, and throws up its arms in horror.

But it's too late and all that can be heard in the distance is the manic chuckle of a magician in a shed who recycles old baked bin tins, paints them black and prints the words 'catatonic converter' on the side.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.