caught speeding

[Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman)]

To have one minor speeding conviction seems to be so common these days, there doesn't seem the significance there used to be. And at least it'll all be "gone" in four years; whereas going down the foreign licence route, as Mark says, you'll always be wondering, and then just when you forget you have that "doh" moment as they catch up with it.

[Nick M]

If not then chuck it in the bin and say it must have been lost in the post. That will be some more money wasted

"Dear Mr Plod,

I'm sorry to say that I can't tell you who was driving the car because I didn't receive the letter you sent to me so it must have got lost in the post....

DOH !!!!"

[Martin Keene]

Err, poorly explained.

Chuck it in the bin and ignore it. Until they come after you with something they can proved was delivered, I'm sure I read somewhere, they get fed up after 3 attempts.

Might be talking out my though...

[chazpowerslide]

If it goes to court you really need to try to discredit their evidence in any way you can.

If you can find any flaws in the case they provide (make or model of the car is wrong/street name incorrect/time of the incident not correct ect) you can argue that as components of the case cannot be relied upon neither can the rest of the case.

As they have made errors in parts of their evidence the rest can be discredited as unreliable.

I have avoided 1 speeding fine and points and 2 parking tickets using this tactic.

Get as much info off them as you can, work through it and proove it wholey or partly wrong and present your case for un-reliable evidence.

Chaz.