CosKev Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Set of four in Anthracite,pics will follow but they are in as new condition. 4x108 Ford Front tyres R888R 185/60 13's, Rear tyres R888R 205/60 13's. Tyres are 2015 year of manufacture ,tread depth basically as new. ET15. £600 collected from SY11 Shropshire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve (sdh2903) Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 R1r in 13s? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosKev Posted November 19, 2020 Author Share Posted November 19, 2020 19 minutes ago, Steve (sdh2903) said: R1r in 13s? 🤦♂️ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Westfield Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 What PCD are they on ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosKev Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 25 minutes ago, Kent Westfield said: What PCD are they on ? Sorry 4x108 Ford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosKev Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingster Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Billy Bargain - sadly I already have 3x sets of 13” wheels! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Westfield Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Chaps, I am interested in these wheels - but could do with a bit of guidance. My main purpose of changing is to fill the rear wheel arches as the current wheels sit inboard and look hideous. I am on 15x6.5J ET: 0 mm. 195/50 R15 Tyres. The above Rear: 13x7J ET: 15mm ( I assume this is +ve offset). Tyres: 205 /60 R13. Plugging these numbers into the calculator throws out the results below. So just for my clarity, the 'Poke' is reduced from 82.6 to 73.9 mm. Does this mean that the wheels will sit more inboard (by 8.7mm) than my old wheels? Or is the notation the opposite? Or should I be looking at the inset? The wheels above have a 21.6mm larger inset, does this mean the wheels are pushed outboard by this much? Kev, Sorry to hijack your add. If the geometry works correctly - I am interested in these. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingster Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Will they fit has a visual indication - looks like you cut that bit off in the screen grab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosKev Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 21 minutes ago, Kent Westfield said: Does this mean that the wheels will sit more inboard (by 8.7mm) than my old wheels Yeah,if you are certain your wheels are ET0?🤔 Got pics of the car? Unless you've got massive rear arches ET0 wheels shouldn't be too far in the arches🤷🏾♂️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingster Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 As Kev says et0 should fill the arches? also the figures don’t look quite right (diameter?) this is what I see... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosKev Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Westfield Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Photos below. Believe it or not, the car is already fitted with spacers. It is a wide body so wheel arches are wider ? I measured from the back face of the wheel mounting hub to the front and this was coming to 82.5mm. I did this with the spare wheel by placing it face down, and measuring the depth from the mounting face to the ground. With a 6.5 wheel width, I am calculating the ET at 2.5mm ish. In reality I think that 2.5mm is the tyre wall. Something does not quite stack up ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingster Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Et0 wheels will almost certainly have a “dish” - they don’t. Look like typical et35 wheels to me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Westfield Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Chris King - Webmaster said: Et0 wheels will almost certainly have a “dish” - they don’t. Look like typical et35 wheels to me. I’m struggling with the calculations. The wheel does not have the ET marked. Some more photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts