Timo Posted February 24, 2003 Share Posted February 24, 2003 For all of us who feel only the deepest love and affection for the way computers have enhanced our lives, read on. At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gatesreportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon". In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics: 1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day. 2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car. 3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this. 4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine. 5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads. 6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning ligh 7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying. 8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna. 9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car 10.You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off. Please share this with your friends who love - but sometimes hate - their computer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenwolf Posted February 24, 2003 Share Posted February 24, 2003 Teee heeee ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Albert Posted February 24, 2003 Share Posted February 24, 2003 Of course there is the alternative view of the US Auto Industry as evidenced by the public domain Ford memo where their lawyers advised them not to re-engineer the Pintos with the exploding fuel tanks before they'd sold any as the cost of the delay/re-engineering was likely to exceed the cost of the claims from the dead drivers relatives. Can't remember Microsoft choosing to let people die rather than make less profit. Also can't remember the open-toed sandal brigade making/using/selling more illegal copies of Chevys, Caddys, GTOs etc. than licensed ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David_East Posted February 24, 2003 Share Posted February 24, 2003 So Bill G doesn't always use his own material or have original thoughts Back in the late 80's, I can't remember the exact year, the then chairman of Compaq made similar observations. To the effect that if Rolls Royce had made the same advances in technology as the computer industry then the car would go 100,000 miles between services and would cost so little that at the end of that time it could be thrown away I've been scouring the local tip ever since No luck!! The local car boot brigade have always beaten me to it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.