kevip6 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Kevip - The video doesn't represent real time, would you agree? It is representing time at an increased rate, would you agree? So we can say that it has been speeded up, would you agree? So what we are left with is this - as long as the camera can be moved in discreet repeatable movements along only one plane, we would get the desired effect, would you agree? Yes, the martix was not the best example. Try this one: the characters in the clip above are not robotically controlled Hi Rabbit, I completely agree with everything you have just said! All I was trying to say is that most time lapse photography based videos that use panning or rotation would use a device ( no matter how basic ) to move the camera as whilst this can be done manually it is a VERY hard thing to do as well as it was done in this film. I really done care if it was done manually or automatically, I just strongly suggest, due to the quality of execution that this was done on some form of automated head. Now that's done and dusted we can just enjoy the great video! It actually prompted me to go home at lunch and get my Westfield out for a drive in the glorious sunshine we had today. Pity the roads weren't quite up to par with these ones though!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.