Jump to content

Great Driving Roads


Mark Redpath - WSCC Membership Secretary

Recommended Posts

It's done at something like one shot every two seconds, so with skill and a deft touch, you could manually reposition a tripod mounted camera with a pan & tilt head - use the pan index marks to achieve a consistent "sweep" round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • kevip6

    7

  • Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman

    7

  • rocket_rabbit

    4

  • Norman Verona

    2

the panoramic shorts are easily done with photoshop just by taking multiple photos.

???

Could your wife please explain how to do a panning video timelapse shot using Photoshop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's done at something like one shot every two seconds, so with skill and a deft touch, you could manually reposition a tripod mounted camera with a pan & tilt head - use the pan index marks to achieve a consistent "sweep" round.

I agree it's possible but you're talking about very small rotations each time. I would say it's very hard to do that as smoothly as this was done manually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add, a rotating telescope tripod head isn't a complex or overly expensive piece of equipment

Absolutely, and makes it much easier! But I have seen some stunning time lapse work done with manually moved pan heads on a tripod and with very simple, non-motorised "dollies" made from all sorts things, including skate-boards!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, and makes it much easier! But I have seen some stunning time lapse work done with manually moved pan heads on a tripod and with very simple, non-motorised "dollies" made from all sorts things, including skate-boards!

I'm definitely not arguing with that, I've seen some amazing work with the most basic of kit but from looking at the way this was done with the rotating and people walking in the shot I would definitely put money on it being and automated head. If I'm wrong then hats off to the guy cause it's awesome compositionally even with the gadgets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

???

Could your wife please explain how to do a panning video timelapse shot using Photoshop?

I was on about the use of software instead of specialist hardware.

Let's not forget that a video is just lots of still images viewed sequentially at high speed.

It's certainly not an automated head. You are getting confused because the video is speeded up and it looks like a static point shot is fluid motion.

Remember that a tripod can easily allow movement in a single plane whilst keeping the others static.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was done with normal SLR cameras.

Looks like the video camera is on a sloping rail, but it's actually many different static camera sequenced in a way to give that impression

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God that Click here's almost as bad as a big red "Do Not Press" button. :angry: :angry: :angry:

:blush::oops::down:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was on about the use of software instead of specialist hardware.

Let's not forget that a video is just lots of still images viewed sequentially at high speed.

It's certainly not an automated head. You are getting confused because the video is speeded up and it looks like a static point shot is fluid motion.

Remember that a tripod can easily allow movement in a single plane whilst keeping the others static.

I know this is going off topic somewhat but I think you are wrong.

It's not a speeded up video at all but a timelapse video which is (as you mentioned later) a series of single exposures taken at set durations (normally with a longish exposure time). To get the panning effect a single camera is used usually on a telescope head that rotates at a set speed to capture the timelapse whilst panning or rotating. As I mentioned earlier, it's possible to do this manually without an automated tripod head but to get a motion that smooth the head would need to be rotate by a very small angle between each shot and the operator would need to sit by the camera rotating this small amount over the course of the entire shot, which could be an hour or so depending on how you want to set the timelapse.

The matrix shot is a very different technique which as you mentioned uses a number of cameras set in a ring around the subject

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally, if you like "budget" Heath-Robinson gadgets for this sort of thing, this is what the owner of one of the GoPro forums came up with. GoPro Pan timer

Really effective, I understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I can't remember the guy's Blatchat username, and he doesn't seem to get on You Tube that often, or we could ask him. (I'm just plain interested in the making of this sort of thing :p:laugh: as I'm making the painful transition from still to moving pictures at the moment :oops: ).

Here's the nearest snippet from him as to how it was done -

I used a piece of software called Timelapse Assembler for the mac to make the time lapse footage.From memory I believe I was shooting at 1 shot every 2 seconds and transformed it to 30fps, meaning that a 10 second clip was gleaned from about 10 minutes of filming, so it really didn't take all that long

A link to the guy's channel clicky not watched them all, but there's four vid's up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for any confusion, its not my video, I'm Westfield through and through, but still makes me want to get the westi out, one of the better vids around, I personally think its great, watched it far too many times.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God that Click here's almost as bad as a big red "Do Not Press" button. :angry: :angry: :angry:

:blush::oops::down:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Hehehe, yeah I know it has caught a few people out :) I should remove it, just that I was in a bad mood when I put it up and felt like annoying people :)

Kevip - The video doesn't represent real time, would you agree? It is representing time at an increased rate, would you agree? So we can say that it has been speeded up, would you agree?

So what we are left with is this - as long as the camera can be moved in discreet repeatable movements along only one plane, we would get the desired effect, would you agree?

Yes, the martix was not the best example. Try this one:

the characters in the clip above are not robotically controlled :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.