markh1970 Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 The Lotus debate Seems to be happening again.... Quote
RedditchJay Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 OMG..... every few years same old same old...... Quote
matt_c Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 Pointless observation: The word 'Lotus' appears in that article at a ratio of almost 1 in 3 Quote
Asterix Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 It's a bit like Renault without the argument. Quote
pistonbroke Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 Seems the controversey is over using the "Team Lotus" name , rather than just "Lotus" The Debate Quote
matt_c Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 Seems the controversey is over using the "Team Lotus" name , rather than just "Lotus" The Debate I had a feeling that was the case, Lotus preventing Lotus from using the name Lotus (as per the first article) didn't make a lot of sense to me. Quote
Tubs Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 Seems the controversey is over using the "Team Lotus" name , rather than just "Lotus" The Debate I had a feeling that was the case, Lotus preventing Lotus from using the name Lotus (as per the first article) didn't make a lot of sense to me. I thought it made perfect sense - given it was F1. I wonder if this would be happening if Lotus had won a race or two Tubs Quote
Tigger Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 I didn't even realise that Lotus wasn't actually Lotus, it was in fact Lotus. Damn confusing Quote
Doug Dastardly Posted September 30, 2010 Posted September 30, 2010 Forgive my ignorance...... Does this mean that the Lotus F1 team has nothing to do with Lotus, makers of road cars? Do Maclaren not make pushchairs then? Presuming Ferrari's are still italian, Doug Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.