Buzz Billsberry Posted May 3, 2010 Posted May 3, 2010 The only thing its lacking is two more cylinders then it would sound really good Buzz Quote
Torqueman Posted May 4, 2010 Author Posted May 4, 2010 The only thing its lacking is two more cylinders then it would sound really good Buzz Yepp cannot deny that Quote
SparkyB Posted May 4, 2010 Posted May 4, 2010 I'm just sobbing in a corner at the moment....... Quote
markcoopers Posted May 5, 2010 Posted May 5, 2010 I'm just sobbing in a corner at the moment....... Much like you 2 x duratec pile Quote
dombanks Posted May 5, 2010 Posted May 5, 2010 I had a mundano with that engine, it was a lovely car to drive and I always thought it would be a good engine foe a westy but with a st170 being the same stock power is it worth the hassle of anon satndard engine? Or as I suspected back then can u wring a load more power out of it? I drove both a 2.0l and the v6 mundano , the v6 was the better of the two effortles to drive and loads of grunt low down till the 24 v came online , I know a couple of my mates with much faster cars could be kept humble if they didn't pay attention Quote
Torqueman Posted May 6, 2010 Author Posted May 6, 2010 I had a mundano with that engine, it was a lovely car to drive and I always thought it would be a good engine foe a westy but with a st170 being the same stock power is it worth the hassle of anon satndard engine? Or as I suspected back then can u wring a load more power out of it? I drove both a 2.0l and the v6 mundano , the v6 was the better of the two effortles to drive and loads of grunt low down till the 24 v came online , I know a couple of my mates with much faster cars could be kept humble if they didn't pay attention But then you can always throw in the 3,0 litre Mondeo 220 engine! That would be my choice. With some extra breathing ofcourse Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.