DavidR Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 If it had been a conspiracy by a covert agency, we'd be mourning the untimely death of a Princess who had an undaignosed medical condition... For a famous person always chased by the press and who never wore a seatbelt, a car accident would be a perfect cover. Car accident under the circumstances seen ( proposed by conspiracy merchants) would have been too uncertain. If one is going to plan such a deed - be certain of success. ( and don't have 20 (or whatever) potential witnesses with cameras . It's sad anyone died but was probably a cockup / negligence on the part of a drunk driver and his employer. Quote
Blatman Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 Yup. Car crash is not "certain" enough. Litvinjenko was poisoned in an amateurish fashion with a chemical that was reasonably easily traced. I'm sure Scott Beeland could list any number of toxins that would do the job but would escape a post mortem by looking like natural causes Quote
Carl Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 QUOTE Yup. Car crash is not "certain" enough But it worked though Quote
Carl Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 QUOTE But it wasn't planned It was planned well enough to fool you Quote
Blatman Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 Depends... I have good contacts in the media. Very good... Quote
Carl Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 QUOTE Depends... OK, I'm sorry, it didn't fool you. Next time they'll plan it better I'm sure. Quote
Bananaman Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 Andy, agree about his lawyers but why our expense? Is it not the British Tax payer who forked out for this fiasco Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.