Euan Hoosearmy Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 11 hours ago, Tim Sideways said: Going off that Spot the Difference post, I’m thinking our car may well be a ‘kit’ but only based on the size of the lugs and the two sets of bonnet clips. All good to know, but I guess there’s so many variables on these cars that a definitive answer is probably not possible. Hey ho, I just want it now 👍 If you confirm what body type you have and it is a "kit" (Andrew at ToyBox should know) let me know if you're interested in the hood and frame. I can get some pictures if it would help. I put it on the car once but don't know how much the previous owner used it, my guess is not much as he only did 9k miles in 23 years. The strip that clips onto the top of the screen is split, but i believe that is a common failure. 1 Quote
Tim Sideways Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago 10 hours ago, Paul Hurdsfield - Joint Manchester AO said: The luggage capacity on a Westfield is fine for two people on a two week euro tour 😎 Haha, nice! That's actually a really helpful picture as the rear of your car looks to be exactly the same as ours. Do you have a full hood and do you have any pictures of it up? DM me if you prefer. Many thanks! Quote
Tim Sideways Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago 43 minutes ago, Euan Hoosearmy said: If you confirm what body type you have and it is a "kit" (Andrew at ToyBox should know) let me know if you're interested in the hood and frame. I can get some pictures if it would help. I put it on the car once but don't know how much the previous owner used it, my guess is not much as he only did 9k miles in 23 years. The strip that clips onto the top of the screen is split, but i believe that is a common failure. Could be of interest then. Let's see what pans out and I'll let you know. Many thanks! Quote
Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Easiest ways to tell the two bodywork style apart is how the nose cone attaches to the chassis, and the shape of the scuttle where it meets the dash. Pop up some photos of these areas and we can confirm in a flash! Quote
Flying Carrot Steve Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 17 hours ago, Kingster said: I appreciate that info @Kingsterbut what I really meant is why are they called that, what is the difference between the two from Westfield's marketing viewpoint, ie why is one called 'kit', the other ZK etc? ie, not how to tell them apart but what is the difference between them if that makes sense? 1 Quote
Euan Hoosearmy Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I don't think the factory ever differentiated from a marketing POV and just changed what they supplied over time and we as owners have been left to play "spot the difference". My "kit" SEiW was sold in 1997 as a "Sport 2000". The invoice just says SEi Chassis and SEi Body+Det rear arches. The order confirmation says "SEi Wide" 2 Quote
Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago It's just behind the scenes notation for different generations of Westfield. The very first body design was what became the Pre Lit, this was a copy to a greater extent of the Caterham Seven. After a legal case saw Westfield being forced to make the body style unique to Westfield, they released what we now know of as Kit Bodywork. It wouldn't really be known as this at the time though, it was just the body style offered. Around 2000, give or take a year or two, (like much around Westfields, exact timelines are tricky, as there can be overlaps) the bodywork received a subtle re-style this is what we know as the ZK bodywork. In everyday use, it was still just the bodywork, for the first few years, but the ZK suffix was important to be aware of, as the nose, bonnet and scuttle were different to the previous Kit bodywork and couldn't be mixed from an aesthetic point of view. In the early mid 2000's the FW body shape was launched, as this was to be sold along side the "traditional standard" body shape, to avoid confusion, it became much more common to refer to the two as FW and ZK styles. There have been some sub variations to the body over the years, and chassis developments have not run neatly alongside body developments, each has been at their own pace. Plus parts are often retrofittable. So it would have been much harder for the factory to simply name them Westfield mk 1, mk 2, mk 3 and so on. 1 1 Quote
Flying Carrot Steve Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman said: It's just behind the scenes notation for different generations of Westfield. The very first body design was what became the Pre Lit, this was a copy to a greater extent of the Caterham Seven. After a legal case saw Westfield being forced to make the body style unique to Westfield, they released what we now know of as Kit Bodywork. It wouldn't really be known as this at the time though, it was just the body style offered. Around 2000, give or take a year or two, (like much around Westfields, exact timelines are tricky, as there can be overlaps) the bodywork received a subtle re-style this is what we know as the ZK bodywork. In everyday use, it was still just the bodywork, for the first few years, but the ZK suffix was important to be aware of, as the nose, bonnet and scuttle were different to the previous Kit bodywork and couldn't be mixed from an aesthetic point of view. In the early mid 2000's the FW body shape was launched, as this was to be sold along side the "traditional standard" body shape, to avoid confusion, it became much more common to refer to the two as FW and ZK styles. There have been some sub variations to the body over the years, and chassis developments have not run neatly alongside body developments, each has been at their own pace. Plus parts are often retrofittable. So it would have been much harder for the factory to simply name them Westfield mk 1, mk 2, mk 3 and so on. Thanks Dave, that is some good insight and educational info right there. Much appreciated 👍 1 Quote
Tim Sideways Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Chairman said: Easiest ways to tell the two bodywork style apart is how the nose cone attaches to the chassis, and the shape of the scuttle where it meets the dash. Pop up some photos of these areas and we can confirm in a flash! Once I've got it, I will. Not going to bother Andrew for pictures as I'd rather him and the team were getting on with things so I can get our car 1 Quote
Paul Hurdsfield - Joint Manchester AO Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 12 hours ago, Tim Sideways said: Haha, nice! That's actually a really helpful picture as the rear of your car looks to be exactly the same as ours. Do you have a full hood and do you have any pictures of it up? DM me if you prefer. Many thanks! Here ya go, obviously like all Westfields it’s never been driven in the wet 🙄 2 Quote
Tim Sideways Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Paul Hurdsfield - Joint Manchester AO said: Here ya go, obviously like all Westfields it’s never been driven in the wet 🙄 Perfect. Thanks, that helps a lot. Where do the hood rails/supports live when it’s down? Quote
Stuart Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago @Tim Sideways they fold down under the bootbox lid 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.