Jump to content

Starmer wants to lower the voting age- a good idea ?.


Richard (OldStager)

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, jeff oakley said:

People fought and died to get the vote and yet turnout is always pitiful. 

 

Whilst I whole-heartedly agree with the sentiment... people fought and died for "freedom" for want of a better, dare I say lengthier sentence. That includes the freedom to decline the opportunity to vote if one so chooses. I do think that voting should be compulsory with a "none of the above" option so that there can be some legitimacy to the result and better rules around how we go about the democratic process, IE with a bit of irony!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Blatman said:

 

Whilst I whole-heartedly agree with the sentiment... people fought and died for "freedom" for want of a better, dare I say lengthier sentence. That includes the freedom to decline the opportunity to vote if one so chooses. I do think that voting should be compulsory with a "none of the above" option so that there can be some legitimacy to the result and better rules around how we go about the democratic process, IE with a bit of irony!

 you misunderstand me on this. I was referring to the men who had to fight to get the vote for every man and women who died fighting for the right. This was seperate to the wars fought for differrent reasons

 

It was only in 1918 that every man over the age of 21 got the right to vote, before that it had been the richest, then it was those who owned a property.

 

Women of wealth got the votes first and eventually all got it but many did die over many years in doing so. It was seen as a great step that each citizen has an equal vote one which we no longer see as a privilege and one around the world people still fight for free elections where everyone regardless gets a vote.

 

If they did put none of the above it might well shock the political leaders just how bad they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

Winston Churchill

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Blatman said:

I do think that voting should be compulsory with a "none of the above" option so that there can be some legitimacy to the result and better rules around how we go about the democratic process


I was just thinking that going down this road or “Abstain” as I earlier posted, while the right way to go, would result in a few people changing their names to None Of The Above, Nun Of The Above (while campaigning dressed as a nun), A B Stain or Abby Stain.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30/05/2024 at 20:10, jeff oakley said:

 you misunderstand me on this. I was referring to the men who had to fight to get the vote for every man and women who died fighting for the right. This was seperate to the wars fought for differrent reasons

 

It was only in 1918 that every man over the age of 21 got the right to vote, before that it had been the richest, then it was those who owned a property.

 

Women of wealth got the votes first and eventually all got it but many did die over many years in doing so. It was seen as a great step that each citizen has an equal vote one which we no longer see as a privilege and one around the world people still fight for free elections where everyone regardless gets a vote.

 

If they did put none of the above it might well shock the political leaders just how bad they are

 

Fair enough, I was thinking about a different fight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Captain Colonial said:


I was just thinking that going down this road or “Abstain” as I earlier posted, while the right way to go, would result in a few people changing their names to None Of The Above, Nun Of The Above (while campaigning dressed as a nun), A B Stain or Abby Stain.

 

 

 

And I just remembered, the option to show contempt for the politicos alrady exists. Spoil your ballot. The number of spoiled ballots is actually read out and logged/registered.

https://votingcounts.org.uk/spoilt-ballot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Blatman said:

 

And I just remembered, the option to show contempt for the politicos alrady exists. Spoil your ballot. The number of spoiled ballots is actually read out and logged/registered.

https://votingcounts.org.uk/spoilt-ballot


…which is what I did in 2019, putting a huge cross across the whole thing and writing “No Suitable Party Or Candidate” at the bottom.  First time ever and I wasn’t happy about doing so, but at least I made an effort to have my say at the ballot box.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.