Jump to content

Money no object cars with "wind in your hair"


CraigHew

Recommended Posts

Just tripped over this on Youtube.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see the point of these at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/07/2021 at 09:13, Rush Motorsport said:

I don’t see the point of these at all. 

I don't quite get them either, Westi, Atom etc I get, large Super/Hyper cars I don't. Guess they are aimed at people with more money than they know what to do with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in recent years we've seen the newly rich people asking for more and more exotic cars that just more and more ridiculous. That's what is going on here, it started with the Ferrari Monza then the rest just jumped on the bandwagon. Basing the cars on an existing mechanical platform meant they could make massive profits out of them. Hey 2 of the companies are British, most of the customers are overseas, I'm all for it, crack on. Personally I think they are nuts, :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one for I don't get them either.

 

If you want a drivers car then a cat 7, Westy , Atom and a host of others can provide that for you, but these cars that are capable of silly top speeds and cost the earth don't do it for me.

 

I am left wondering that with onset of EV's , that perhaps all these supercar manufacturers are just creating their swansongs just because they can, if you are fortunate to be able to afford one then fine, but why?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to present the alternative viewpoint, what is the point of a "top of the range" Westfield or Caterham, or similar? There really isn't a difference in principle. They all make the ultimate trackday car, which is also road usable. So if I'm a billionaire (which I can assure you I'm not!) then if I'm a motorsport fan, why not buy an ultimate Aston Martin (or whatever) for my trackday fun? In the same wy, if I'm a sailing fan, why not pay £x,000,000 for an ultimate sailing yacht?

No more (or less) daft than you on your more modest income/capital buying a Westerham for your trackday fun.

 

Oh, and you avoid the bee by using a full face crash helmet, just the same as I used to use when I took my Westfield sprint car out on the public highway for any distance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair points Stephen, but for me if I were to do a trackday, I would much rather, from a driving point of view,  wish to be driving a car that was engaging and one that on the road driving at 50mph, is as thrilling as perhaps an Aston is at 150mph, I am sure they are huge fun, but only at much higher speeds and unless you are on a long straight or happen to live in Germany, you aren't going to be driving anywhere near is limits and for me that's a waste of a car. The money side of it is academic for me, it's about having fun legally, or as legal as you can get on the roads anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that top end cars are nice to look at   But not practical if you are going to use it,  the cost of brake pads etc and dealer service prices to keep it worth anything when you sell it 1000s for tyres and scared to crash it, give me a westy any day, 

if money was no object I would have a westy with a v10 judd engine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, fil46 said:

But not practical if you are going to use it,  the cost of brake pads etc and dealer service prices to keep it worth anything when you sell it 1000s for tyres and scared to crash it,

 

People who can afford those sort of cars generally don't care about servicing costs, brake pads, tyres etc. For the very wealthy, these costs are trivial.

If money was no object then one could have every car on any list of "dream" cars, drive them all and pick the "best" one for themselves given that there is no right answer to what's "best".

And if I had a Judd engine, it would go in an "old" open top LMP2 like a Zytek...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of a few people that have had the big fancy car and got rid as soon as it started costing money, they tend to be loaded because they don't waist it.

nice choice for the Judd 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, fil46 said:

they tend to be loaded because they don't waist it.

 

The premise is money no object. If the prosepctive owner needs to think about ownership because of servicing costs, then money is an object and a barrier to ownership ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.