Jump to content

If you was KING!


Recommended Posts

Posted

The general premise of this nonsense is for you to say what you would do if you was KING....

If was King! For a start.......

  • We'd not have more than one  meanings for the same word.    sore, saw, too, to etc....  
  • Silent letters have no use..... Gone    so we'd have nifes, nobs, lites.   
  • We'd lose the U after Q since is they are always together lets assume its there... Any qestions?
  •  I'd definitely look at the use of adjectives....  More hard (harder), Less hard (softer),  more bouncy (bouncier), Less bouncy (??), more powerful (powerful-er!), Less powerful (?).   More old (older), less old (younger).      Using 2 words seems to work fine always without needing to sometimes convert to one word.
  • i before e always no exceptions...   this is not rocket Science

 

  • The most important change would be to the internal combustion engine...  All would have to have a proper engine configuration V... all others banned....   how much better would life be if we all had V4's, v6's and V8's .    Mowing the grass could be done with a smile.  Any cheating with flat plain cranks would be banned also.  
  • Recycling of vehicles without melting them down would be considered green and tax free.
  • Christmas would be in the summer and always on a Sunday.    That way we'd get time off work when its nice westy driving weather.  Also Sunday just because it cuts down on the big flatulence meals to cook.

 

Posted

I am :d

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Chris King - Webmaster and Joint North East AO said:

I am :d

Done in one. :d

Posted
2 hours ago, DamperMan said:

The general premise of this nonsense is for you to say what you would do if you was KING....

If was King! For a start.......

  • We'd not have more than one  meanings for the same word.    sore, saw, too, to etc....  
  • Silent letters have no use..... Gone    so we'd have nifes, nobs, lites.   
  • We'd lose the U after Q since is they are always together lets assume its there... Any qestions?
  •  I'd definitely look at the use of adjectives....  More hard (harder), Less hard (softer),  more bouncy (bouncier), Less bouncy (??), more powerful (powerful-er!), Less powerful (?).   More old (older), less old (younger).      Using 2 words seems to work fine always without needing to sometimes convert to one word.
  • i before e always no exceptions...   this is not rocket Science

 

 

If I were a King I would ensure that all of my subjects were taught English, their grammar, spelling and usage would be of a the highest order :p.

exempli gratia:

To is not the same word as too;

Knife is singular, Knives are plural;

When U follows Q it is to form a sound;

Less bouncy = firmer, "powerful-er" ( shame on you), Less powerful = weaker, why use two words when one will suffice?

However, I know that "DamperMan" was just merely having a laugh, you were weren't you ???

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Chris King - Webmaster and Joint North East AO said:

I am :d

That explains the smug look on your face. And I thought it was because you'd just been for a blat in the Westie :)

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Nick - Joint North East AO said:

That explains the smug look on your face. And I thought it was because you'd just been for a blat in the Westie :)

Only if he pushes it round where he lives currently :d

  • Like 2
Posted

Surprising today how many don't seem to know the difference between "brought" past simple and past participle of bring & "bought"   past simple and past participle of buy:t-up:

maybe we just got lazier :rolleyes: 

Posted

My "pedant mode" pet hate is the number of times people ask for "advise" when they mean advice - and don't get me started on apostrophes!

OK, maybe there's more important things to worry about... :)

Posted
7 hours ago, Chris King - Webmaster and Joint North East AO said:

Don't get me started on apostrophes!

Don't you mean apostrophe's? 

:p

 

Posted

I am leader of the Pedants' Revolt!

Signed,

Whom Tyler

:d

Posted

I'll comma dodge that! 

Posted

Isn't it "If you were king?"

  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Quinten said:

Isn't it "If you were king?"

Pedant...

Posted

If I was King, I would abolish the monarchy and use the money to ensure that all pensioners were looked after as well as Liz and Phil and use Buckingham Palace as a care home.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.