kirkyboy5 Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 Section 1-58 of the traffic act are different offences. Dan Quote
Graham0127 Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 This posting just goes on and on......how about something less controversial ?? GAY MARRIAGE Quote
Norman Verona Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 I have no problem with gay marriage. It's working for me! But I do have a problem if you make a religious ceremony of it. The religious aspect is meant to join two people for the purpose of procreation. So I guess I'd have to issue a section 59 on that. Quote
kirkyboy5 Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 "Its actually of the police reform act" dont know what i was thinking of dan Quote
dombanks Posted April 5, 2013 Posted April 5, 2013 I have no problem with gay marriage. It's working for me! But I do have a problem if you make a religious ceremony of it. The religious aspect is meant to join two people for the purpose of procreation. So I guess I'd have to issue a section 59 on that., come on norm you lived in sheffield, you should be all to aware that you dont need to be maried to procreate! Quote
Norman Verona Posted April 5, 2013 Posted April 5, 2013 I didn't say that. I said that in the eyes of religion, marriage is for the purpose of procreation. So, I have no problem with same sex marriages for legal purposes but I'm uneasy about church/mosque/synagogue same sex weddings. ed to add that I know you were joking but thought I'd make that clear. I actually spent my first 43 years in London. I'm a true cockney. Brought up in Hackney and then lived in Barkingside and Chigwell Essex until moving to South Yorkshire. Lived ther for 15 years and came her. So, 43+15+7=65. I've lost a year of my life. Have you seen it lying around somewhere? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.