Firstly, well done to all the guys at three sisters, looks like some impressive driving with a few target times being beaten.
I have however spotted what I think is a flaw in the target times.
With the decission having been made to adopt STE's for those times which were felt to be soft, we have ended up in a situation with a competitor in class D (John Hoyle) beating a competitor in class F (ACW), but getting fewer points due to their being a target time in F and an STE in D.
Whilst I understand how STE's were adopted, I don't agree with the princiles used, as in my opinion, the previous years system should have remained in place, allowed to run its course, and over time, things would have evened themselves out.
I realise that there was an argument that a poorly subscribed class with "soft " target times may have yeilded an "unworthy?" champion, but this system now appears to be penalising a fast driver.
As this is early season, it may well be the case that this situation will repeat itself, and whilst it is undesirable, I would not expect any action to be taken. Neither would I want Target times revised at the end of the year, other than for those new time posted. This event has also highlighted the fact that BEC's are quicker than CEC's at some venues, with class G cars beating H.
Food for thought for the SSOT....