Jump to content

DIY Facemask


Alan France

Recommended Posts

For those infrequent shopping trips for the essentials. Here is research by Cambridge University on the materials to use for a DIY facemask. They shot a virus smaller than Covid-19 (2nd graph) at a variety of materials and the top 4 results are:

 

Surgical Mask 89%

Vacuum Cleaner Bag 86%

T Towel 73%

Cotton Blend 70%

 

As you will see from the article doubling up of material was tried and breathability tested.

 

Wife is now experimenting with one layer of T Towel plus one layer of 100% Cotton.

 

https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/best-materials-make-diy-face-mask-virus/

 

Probably better than nothing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Alan France said:

For those infrequent shopping trips for the essentials. Here is research by Cambridge University on the materials to use for a DIY facemask. They shot a virus smaller than Covid-19 (2nd graph) at a variety of materials and the top 4 results are:

 

For those making Frequent panic buying trips, I'd suggest double bagging with rubble sacks, fastened tightly with a few hundred meters of gaffer tape 😉

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a quick trip to the local pond / reservoir, not forgetting a few bricks tied to your ankles to really help ward off that virus.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be very careful home printing "protective" masks, the typical use home printer materials and the process itself are not really suitable. The layering process creates vastly more areas to trap nasty stuff, and the common low temperature materials cannot be sterilised in any meaningful way.

 

For secondary devices like holders for the clear plastic face shields, it's a different situation, but for direct masks, you could, in the worst case do more harm than good....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before I got banged up for 84 days yesterday, I was in a supermarket behind a man wearing a proper ventilation breather mask and rubber gloves (looked a b***).  I told him that it can get in through the eyes too so wearing a mask and gloves was not entirely foolproof.  I swear to you all that the next thing he did was to close his eyes and kept them closed, only opening them for split seconds to navigate. 🙄

  • Haha 9
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Dave Eastwood (Gadgetman) - Club Secretary said:

Be very careful home printing "protective" masks, the typical use home printer materials and the process itself are not really suitable. The layering process creates vastly more areas to trap nasty stuff, and the common low temperature materials cannot be sterilised in any meaningful way.

 

For secondary devices like holders for the clear plastic face shields, it's a different situation, but for direct masks, you could, in the worst case do more harm than good....

Good point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good old reserve - large brown paper bag over head and top of body, poke two holes out to see and cover with some see through material and totally Covid-19 safe. 

Added advantage is no one can see what you look like so can carry on hoarding like crazy🤠

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw a kid in our road walking past the other day with a 3ft cardboard box on his head with a huge smile cut out the front...  😄

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tex said:

Saw a kid in our road walking past the other day with a 3ft cardboard box on his head with a huge smile cut out the front...  😄

Heavy duty model🤪

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, final design. Two layers of 100% cotton. The layer of tea towel made it too rigid to fit properly around the nose.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest tests I saw it can remain 'alive' airborne for 3 hours, yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blatman said:

Covid 19 is suddenly airborne, is it?

 Nothing sudden about it. When combined with water droplets from your mouth or nose, it’s airborne, effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you see those tests? Got a link?

 

From The Lancet:

Universal face mask use in the community has also been discouraged with the argument that face masks provide no effective protection against coronavirus infection.

 

And the use of face masks should be by people who are actually infected or suspect they are infected becuase this will catch the droplets responsible for passing the infection.

Perhaps it would also be rational to recommend that people in quarantine wear face masks if they need to leave home for any reason, to prevent potential asymptomatic or presymptomatic transmission.

 

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30134-X/fulltext

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.