Jump to content

Pinto electronic ignition


Kevin Pullen

Recommended Posts

Probably been asked loads of times before as have searched but can’t find my specific question

Pinto 2.1 Vulcan engineering engine with Weber twin choke carbs road use only thinking of changing to an electronic version to get rid of points, So is the Accuspark ones on EBay with vacuum the way to go (don’t need anything fancy) assume it’s best to change the distributor for a new one as well not just the Hall effect sensor thingy

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Ford-Capri-MKI-II-1-6-2-0-Pinto-Electronic-Ignition-Distributor-Red-Rotor-Plugs/180764843758?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used an Aldon Ignitor on mine and have never looked back over more than ten years use. Vacuum isn't a lot of good with individual manifold ducts because the vacuum is 'pulsed' too much. On a common manifold the depression is averaged out over all the inlets. Best to ditch the vacuum.

Aldon Ignitor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weber 38 dgas jetted to suit and on a ported manifold with choke removed fitted on mine has 2 vacuum connections, price of the Aldon  unit is more than the full dizzy coil leads and plugs set on Ebay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@bollockybill and myself recently fitted an AccuSpark dizzy and coil to @John K 's Mr Grumpy. Must say we were impressed with the quality of the kit, and it works. No external amplifier to fit so it maintains the old skool look. We went for the non vacuum as Mr G. is fitted with twin 40's for the reason mentioned above.

Think John is pretty happy with the running too.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using a basic Ford ignition system that was used on early 1.6 Sierras, P100s, etc. It has a separate amplifier. There used to be loads on ebay for peanuts, but having just looked, none about now. It's worked fine for 15 years or so.. I recently had the distributor advance curve tweaked, but can't say I noticed much difference.

If I was doing it again, I think I'd just go for one of the kits that swap the points out for a trigger mechanism.. I see Accuspark ones on ebay around the £35 mark? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one drawback with a simple points eliminator and a non-vacuum distributor is that you have to set the static ignition timing so far advanced, to ensure correct timing at high revs, that starting becomes a challenge. The starter meets resistance from the engine trying to fire so far ahead of TDC that it's trying to run backwards. I pump my throttle (twin Dellortos) a dozen times and then spin the starter with no throttle or choke (choke control removed) until the engine starts 'helping' the starter and the cranking speed rises. The is the time to give a little throttle and it starts. If I had a fully electronic system I'd map it so that the ignition was 0º advance at 0 - 500 rpm (say) to allow easy starting, and then a normal advance curve above a very low idle. But I haven't... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Man On The Clapham Omnibus said:

The one drawback with a simple points eliminator and a non-vacuum distributor is that you have to set the static ignition timing so far advanced, to ensure correct timing at high revs, that starting becomes a challenge. The starter meets resistance from the engine trying to fire so far ahead of TDC that it's trying to run backwards. I pump my throttle (twin Dellortos) a dozen times and then spin the starter with no throttle or choke (choke control removed) until the engine starts 'helping' the starter and the cranking speed rises. The is the time to give a little throttle and it starts. If I had a fully electronic system I'd map it so that the ignition was 0º advance at 0 - 500 rpm (say) to allow easy starting, and then a normal advance curve above a very low idle. But I haven't... :rolleyes:

I know the problem with the standard dizzy is that it has too much advance, but my car's never suffered from bad starting. Quite the opposite actually. As you say a few pumps on the peddle and mine normally fires first kick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are lucky Andrew. I've had two Westfield with Pinto engines and both had this problem. It's not insurmountable but you do need to know the technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Man On The Clapham Omnibus said:

You are lucky Andrew. I've had two Westfield with Pinto engines and both had this problem. It's not insurmountable but you do need to know the technique.

Pump pump pump etc etc... terr ... rrrrer  ...brrrappppp! :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the lumenition performance ignition pack and mine starts first turn of the key from warm or second turn if stone cold. 

Again, 4 or 5 pumps of the pedal before firing usually does the trick. 

Lumenition Performance kit is a couple of hundred quid though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've missed your vocation Andrew! I used to do a passingly good imitation of a Central Line train with all the compressor and motor control noises - until they put on new ones that don't make any interesting hisses and clonks!

I do love the bark of the carbs at a couple of thousand revs I must say. You need to avoid that speed when drive-by sound checks are done though. Mine pops and bangs on the over-run when the silencer gets really hot on a track day - the idle settings on the carbs let just enough fuel through on closed throttles when running down to a bend. Loverly! Poor fuel injected chaps don't have any fun do they...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Mine struggles to start unless I do 3-4 pumps let it spin up then allow a bit of throttle as well

So go non vacuum and blank of vacuum from carbs then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the most usual way, but I cannot give you a definitive answer except to say that a vacuum take off from just one branch of a four-way manifold isn't going to be satisfactory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this BESTEK setup on Ebay after asking about getting it fast road with variable map

 

On your engine I would suggest 10 degrees at 1k, 1...

 
 
eBay7?euid=f0e8ec3fc23546658b0578467d29b418&

New message from: b3stj (428Turquoise Star)

 

On your engine I would suggest 10 degrees at 1k, 16 at 2k, 22 at 3k, 28 at 4k and all in at 35 degrees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selling a few rc cars and bits so thinking of getting something a little more high end what are the best /reasonable options

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Terms of Use, Guidelines and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.